Thursday, October 20, 2022

Letter from Tiffanie Fisher Hoboken City Council, 2nd Ward on Hoboken Board of Education Election Tactics

October 20th, 2022

 
Friends and neighbors,
 
I was so disappointed to see the partisan, slanderous attack mailer sent by the Leaders That Listen ("LTL") BOE slate that many Democrat's across Hoboken received yesterday.  It was reminiscent of the partisan flyers sent out by Team Bhalla in the 2017 non-partisan mayoral race that divided our community in a way and level that it had never been before.  As I said in my newsletter last week, one of the main criteria I am personally looking for in BOE candidates are those who are less divisive.  I met with the LTL candidates Leslie Norwood, Antonio Grana and incumbent Alex De La Torre just after and discussed how important this was to me.  We need uniters, not the dividers which, contrary to what they told me, it seems these three have become. 

If you didn't see it, LTL's attack mailer attempts to paint the competing Kids First candidates as book banning extremists by using dishonest and misleading statements.  Basically a partisan bullying piece. If you actually met Pavel, Cindy and Donna, you would know that nothing could be further from the truth.
 
I do not know for a fact, but if history serves me correctly from the 2017 mayoral race, those of you who are not affiliated with any political party or those who are registered as Republicans would not have received this mailer.  It's the science of a Hoboken local election / law of numbers that I have spoken to you about before - there are more Democrats than Republicans in Hoboken so in a race with a plurality, sacrificing Republican voters could translate to getting more votes and winning.  Let that sink in.  This was the exact strategy the Bhalla campaign followed in 2017 and why Hoboken voted overwhelmingly to reinstate runoffs as a way to stave off this exact type of divisive politics.  Again, if history repeats itself, my guess is there will be at least two more fear-mongering attack mailers like these delivered just days before Election Day.
 
Before you continue, let me first ask you - how many of you reading this had children in school during the pandemic?  How did you feel about your children wearing masks on day one?  How about in year two?  And by year 3 leading into this school year?  If you at any time felt you didn’t want your children to wear masks, then LTL basically is saying you were wrong.
 
I spoke to Donna Magen yesterday, one of the three Kids First candidates, and she was in tears after seeing the bullying LTL attack mailer.  She is married, a mother of two children, one a 5 year old at Brandt, not affiliated with any political party, and never ran for office before.  She put her hand up to run for the BOE to get more involved in her children’s schools.  Certainly not to be attacked by partisan political bullies.  LTL’s attack mailer says she asked for endorsements from QAnon sponsored groups which is a lie.  Do you know what extremism she is actually guilty of?  Struggling in year 2 of the pandemic with her then 3 year old having to wear a mask to school and discussing it on a facebook group with others similarly struggling.  I reviewed ALL of her activity in that group which was only about masks.  Donna has had nothing to do with and doesn’t support QAnon or the NJ Project and she never asked for any endorsement from any group.  And just as an FYI, NJ Project is a predatory Super PAC giving out endorsements to candidates who did not want them like Kids First.  Donna is now concerned about the damage to her reputation based upon the lies that LTL made up in their attack mailer.    
 
With Cindy Wiegand, another Kids First candidate, the LTL bullying mailer was more subtle, using facts in a way that distorts the truth - which in politics is called "paltering" (the link is worth a read).  You have heard me talk about this before.  LTL's attack mailer misleads you to believe that Cindy actively petitioned to remove all safety protocols from her children’s school during the height of COVID.  But that is not the case at all.  Three months ago, about a week before the CDC dropped most protocols for schools, her husband solicited other parents for their support for asking Hoboken Charter, where their three children attend, to loosen COVID restrictions like they were starting to see everywhere.  And the petition actually included research references and referred to the progress that had been made due to masking and vaccines.  Why wouldn't LTL just use the real facts instead of misleading ones?    
 
Pavel Sokolov, is the third Kids First candidate on the mailer.  He is a registered Republican and has not hid this.  Pavel has been very clear on what his position is regarding education, his support for Superintendent Dr. Johnson and advocacy for the LGBTQ+ community.  IMHO, he is socially progressive and fiscally conservative.  You can agree with him, or not.  You can vote for or against him because he is a Republican, or not.   But LTL’s attack mailer wants you to believe that by supporting Republican candidates at the federal level, a BOE candidate is not allowed to have his/her own views in his own community that may differ from the party platform.  And the hypocrisy?  The same LTL candidates champion other current BOE leaders and commissioners who are/were also Republicans who have voted for Republican candidates at the federal level.   
Do you have an issue with this like I do?  In what is our awful two- party system, don't we only have 2 real choices – Red or Blue – in partisan races?  And don't we vote for candidates who are the nominees for the parties who most align with our beliefs?  For me, this has always been the Democratic party.  But do my views align 100% with the party platform?  Example... I am the product of public education and pro-public education.  But when and where our public schools fail, I support alternative forms of education – like charter schools, magnet schools and educational partnership organizations.  This is often contrary to the core Democratic platform.  I point to the City of Rochester, where I grew up in a neighboring suburb.  Rochester has the worst public schools in the state of NY with at least one high school that had a 33% graduation rate just a few years ago.  33%!  In the case of this high school, which is in the most economically depraved area of the city, the public schools were clearly not working on any measure.  The University of Rochester stepped in 7 years ago to create an EPO and has dramatically transformed the school’s culture and outcomes for the school’s students.  Graduation rates last year were up to 85%. So, I can be a Democrat, but can have views on education that don’t perfectly align with my party.
 
Why am I writing this today?  Because the bullying, dishonest and divisive partisan rhetoric and character assassination in our local, non-partisan elections has to stop.  And right now, the only messages out there is that this behavior is somehow ok.  And it isn’t.  And I know you agree with me.  
Maybe you can, but I cannot support any candidates who think dishonest political bullying is acceptable.  Especially those who are running to set the culture for our schools. 
  
 
People ask me why no one ran against Mayor Bhalla in 2021.  It is specifically because of this – the threat of being bullied and maligned publicly by a campaign team that is not afraid to use lies.  Most of us are happy to defend any truth thrown at us as candidates, but it is the well timed, comfortably dishonest mudslinging - like LTL's bulling mailer - that makes it harder to do.  Why would anyone in their right mind want to run for office if they thought they would be subjected to these dishonest attacks and bullying? Think about that - bullying results in uncontested races.  Where there is only one candidate, there are no debates.  Where there are no debates, there is no democracy.  Just one voice which is an autocracy. 
 
As always, please share this with everyone you know who may be interested and reach out any time on any issue important to you: 201-208-1764 or CouncilwomanFisher2@gmail.com.     
 
Tiffanie Fisher
Hoboken City Council, 2nd Ward
 
Engage. Inform. Advocate.
“More Voices are Better”
 
Follow me on Facebook, Instagram or Twitter

Concerned Citizen Speaks at October 19, 2022 City Council Meeting about the Upcoming Board of Education Election

Please click to see the 3 minute presentation of a concerned citizen about the tactics being employed as part of the run up to the 2022 Hoboken Board of Education election in early November.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1XKtVOeb7w&t=4646s

Hoboken City Council Meeting 
October 19, 2022



Monday, October 17, 2022

LETTER: Why is Hoboken supt. treated differently than BOE candidate over GOP ties?

 In a letter to the editor, Hoboken resident Kevin Davis questions why Superintendent of Schools Dr. Christine Johnson is treated different than board of education candidate Pavel Sokolov over their ties to the Republican party.

Dear editor,

As a lifelong active Democrat, I occasionally cross the aisle to support Republican elected and appointed officials. It includes our superintendent who was a registered Republican until right after the school board slates were announced.

Why didn’t they attack Hoboken Superintendent Christine Johnson?

Hoboken Superintendent Dr. Johnson has added educational programming and kept the schools open during the heat of the pandemic. Dr. Johnson is the rare educational leader that everyone likes. Dr. Johnson did all of this, while registered with the Republican party.

Donna Magen and Cindy Wiegand are two great Kids First candidates running for school board. Are Donna and Cindy not qualified because they are not registered with a political party? So, Pavel Sokolov is not qualified because he is?

In 2012, I ran for Croton-on-Hudson Village Trustee as a Democrat and won at the age of 23, becoming the youngest elected official in Westchester County history.

I consider myself to be a member of the Democratic wing of the Democratic party, but in non-partisan elections, it’s important to vote for the best candidates.

For me, that is supporting Pavel Sokolov, Cindy Wiegand, and Donna Magen for the Hoboken School Board.

It is also continuing to support Dr. Johnson, even if she reregisters with the Republican Party.

Vote Kids First on November 8th.

Kevin Davis
Hoboken resident


Other letters by Kevin Davis.... CLICK HERE

Hoboken Board of Education and Hoboken Charter Schools: An Uncomfortable Relationship?

CLICK TO ENLARGE
In 2014 the Hoboken Board of Education super majority initiated a lawsuit against the Hola Dual Language charter school. The lawsuit claimed segregation effects and requested the Commissioner of the NJDOE to "reassess" Hola’s charter, essentially initiating an attempt to close the school. The Hoboken Board of Education lost the lawsuit initially and twice on appeal- finally ending the fiasco in 2017.


The current Board of Education super majority has also protested to the NJDOE Commissioner Elysian Charter School's modest request to add a few seats per grade and is currently disputing Hoboken charter schools fair share of PILOT funds from 770 Jackson Street.
Please consider voting on November 8th for a more inclusive and less litigious and vitriolic Board of Education.

Thursday, October 13, 2022

Brandt Elementary School : Most Segregated School in the Hoboken School District

The "new" Brandt Elementary School is the whitest, least black, least Hispanic, and wealthiest school in the Hoboken School District. It is also the most economically, racially, and ethnically segregated school in the Hoboken School District. These differences are statistically significant leading some speculation as to whether this has been by design.

Monday, October 3, 2022

Latest NJDOE Data: 4 out of 10 students Reading at grade level; Less than 1 out of 10 Students Understand Mathematics at Grade Level; SAT scores below NJ Average

Latest data from the NJ Department of Education (PARCC, SAT, ASSA, etc...) concerning some important Hoboken School District test scores: 

1) Only 4 out of 10 students are reading at grade level; 

2) less than 1 out of 10 students are understanding mathematics at grade level;

3) the average SAT score is 65 points below the NJ state average.

No discussion or presentation at Board meetings. No public plan presented to parents or the community for improvement. No one being held responsible. Just "all good news, all the time" and tax supported public relations spin from the current Hoboken Board of Education trustees.




Friday, September 30, 2022

VIDEO: Why Hoboken is no Longer an Island (The Rise and Fall of Hoboken N.J.)

Hoboken was originally an island, surrounded by the Hudson River on the east and tidal lands at the foot of the New Jersey Palisades on the west. It was a seasonal campsite in the territory of Hackensack, a land of the Lenni-Lenape, who used the serpentine rock found there to carve pipes. Hoboken lies on the west bank of the Hudson River between Weehawken and Union City on the north and Jersey City's “county seat” on the south and west. Directly across the Hudson River are the Manhattan, New York City neighborhoods of West Village and Chelsea. The city of Hoboken had a total area of 2.011 square miles, of which 1.275 square miles of it is land and 0.736 square miles of it is water. Hoboken has had its ups and downs and is rich in history. Today we will discuss the rise and fall of Hoboken.

Chapters: 00:00 Introduction: Hoboken was originally an island 00:53 Inhabited by the Lenni-Lenape 01:55 Henry Hudson first European to lay claim to the area 03:53 Colonel John Stevens bought this portion of New Jersey 05:30 Colonel John Stevens the inventor 07:11 Hoboken in during World War I 08:06 Inventing the Turtle Club 08:59 first officially recorded baseball game 09:49 The opening of Sybil’s cave 10:30 Pop Culture of Hoboken 12:02 A complete economic downturn in the 70’s 14:26 The highest public transportation use of any city 15:40 Closing: The upturn of Hoboken


Thursday, September 29, 2022

Letter to the Editor: Kids First Calls for Transparency- NJDOE Can Approve Referendum Despite a Second Failed Referendum

@GaryHershorn- 14th Street Viaduct, Hoboken

please see TapInto for full story: Click Here 













Dear Editor, 


Despite the defeat of the $241 million Hoboken High School referendum in January, the Hoboken Board of Education (BOE) can bring a second referendum for a new high school to Hoboken voters as early as January 2023.  If Hoboken again votes ‘no’ on the referendum, there is a path by which the BOE could appeal to the State of New Jersey Board of Education to override the will of the voters.


Yes, you read this correctly, we may still be on the hook for new construction even if the community votes ‘no’ again.

Following a second referendum defeat, the Hoboken BOE is empowered to seek to have the unelected State Board of Education mandate construction of a new high school.
The BOE and State can usurp the voting preference of Hoboken residents yet require that homeowners and renters take on the expense to fund this decision for decades to come. 


This is not a hypothetical: Just a few years ago, residents in Freehold, NJ voted down a school facilities expansion two times only to have the Freehold Board of Education convince the State to override Freehold voters. 


Every community member should get informed and vote in the BOE election on November 8th.  Kids First is committed to transparency and accountability and we hope by getting to know us over the next month, we earn your trust and your vote on Nov 8th.


The Kids First Slate understands there are pressing infrastructure and facilities needs for our district and will arrive at solutions through a transparent process and in a fiscally responsible manner. We will rigorously evaluate costs, including construction and recurring operational costs, as well as place the necessary focus on educational enhancements and outcomes. We give you our unwavering commitment to do so with community input and discussion. 


The Kids First Slate will bring creative solutions and new thinking to control costs and optimize space.  For example, we will tap the New Jersey School Development authority, which has money to subsidize NJ school facilities, as one source. We are the only team up for election with a member experienced in going directly to Trenton and securing funding for education. Also, we will enlist City Council and other elected officials to evaluate the full spectrum of existing and new space available to ensure we are optimizing resources to ease the burden on residents who already have the stress of rising costs in every aspect of their lives. 


Importantly, we will make clear the ‘why’ behind what is happening and explain any alternatives that were considered. The Kids First Slate is committed to moving from secretive dealings to community discussion. We believe our role is to advocate for children and education and to do so by listening to the community and the will of the voters. 


The Kids First Team


Pavel Sokolov

Cindy Wiegand

Donna Magen


See Editorial by the Jersey Journal on the January 2022 Hoboken Board of Education referendum



Sunset- Hoboken, NJ September 29, 2022


Sunset- Hoboken, NJ September 29, 2022


Monday, August 29, 2022

Hoboken Public Education Foundation Donates $358K To District- Including Orton Gillingham Program (!)

HOBOKEN, NJ — As part of its mission to strengthen and enrich the public education experience for public school students, the Hoboken Public Education Foundation (HPEF) has donated $358,000 to help support the district.

During its Aug. 22 meeting, the Hoboken Board of Education voted to accept the funding and will distribute it as follows:


  • K-8 Field Trips, Elementary & Middle School Levels: $80,000
  • College Tours, High School Level: $10,000
  • Professional Development/Retreat, District: $10,000
  • HMS Theater Production, Middle School Level: $10,000
  • Orton Gillingham Training*, Elementary Level: $40,000
  • Urban Gardens, Elementary & Middle School Levels: $51,000
  • Family Connections Night, District: $75,000
  • Rachel’s Challenge, Middle & High School Levels: $10,000
  • Debate Program Expansion, High School Level: $20,000
  • Supplies (Hydroponics), District: $52,000

* In July 2010, a US Department of Education agency reported that it could not find any studies meeting its evidence standards to support the efficacy of Orton-Gillingham based strategies.

* According to a review of the literature in 2008, the efficacy of Orton Gillingham training was yet to be established.

* The Florida Center for Reading Research reported in 2006 that it was unable to identify any empirical studies examining the efficacy of the approach specifically as described in Orton-Gillingham training materials.

Prompted by cuts in state aid to public schools in New Jersey, a group of Hoboken mothers decided to launch a non-profit in August 2015 as a way to collect donations in support of specific programs within the schools.

More information on the Hoboken Public Education Foundation as well as past and future plans can be found at this link: https://www.tapinto.net/towns/hoboken/sections/education/articles/hoboken-public-education-foundation-donates-358k-to-district


 

Friday, August 19, 2022

Hoboken School District - American Rescue Plan ESSER III

The American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act provides $122 billion in funding to states and school districts to facilitate the reopening and sustain the safe operation of schools. The Hoboken Public School District was fortunate to receive a total allocation of $5,810,582 to use in the areas of:


  • Resources for principals to provide resources that are needed to address individual school needs
  • Supplies to sanitize and clean the facilities
  • Planning for and coordinating during long-term closures
  • Educational technology purchasing
  • Repairs on school facilities and upgrades to operations & protocols to reduce the risk of virus transmission
  • Maintenance, testing, inspection, repair, replacement and upgrade projects to improve indoor air quality
  • Other activities necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services

November 3, 2021 The Hoboken Public School District hosted small group sessions at 9:00 AM, 1:00 PM and 7:00 PM for stakeholders on November 3, 2021. The agenda for these meetings was as follows:

 

  • Introductions
  • What is ESSER III
  • What is Hoboken’s Total Grant Allocation?
  • What are Hoboken’s Sub Grant Allocations?
  • What are Hoboken Public School’s Thoughts About Spending?
  • What Input Do You Have?
  • Closure

  • On November 8, 2021 the Hoboken Public School District hosted small group sessions at 10:00 AM, 1:00 PM and 6:00 PM for stakeholders. The agenda for these meetings was as follows:

  • Introductions
  • Review of ESSER & Our Allocations
  • Review of Initial District Intent on Spending
  • Review of Input from Stakeholders
  • Finalization of Grant
  • Can the Grant be Changed and What is the Process?
  • Closure

  

The following brainstorming document remained on the website for stakeholders to continue providing input until the grant was submitted on November 23, 2021

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pf9cy8hlIi_Yvp_VBhOHTpqfFqOuIsXiZbHsryaNiFo/edit

 

ESSR III Presentation for the Hoboken School District 

 

Budget Proposed for ESSER III


Wednesday, August 17, 2022

Hoboken School District's Next Community Roundtable Discussion Set For Aug. 24- By KIMBERLY REDMOND

HOBOKEN, NJ — After a $241 million plan to build a new high school in Hoboken was rejected by voters in a January special election, school officials are continuing to seek community feedback to help guide their next steps.





Aug. 24 (1 p.m. virtually and 7 p.m. in-person)

Sept. 14 (10 a.m. virtually and 6 p.m. in person)


Part of that effort has included a series of roundtable meetings with the public “to provide valuable information” and “to answer questions about the budget, enrollment, current facilities, programs and accomplishments.”

So far, the district has held two sessions and plans to host two more:

All in-person meetings will be held at Hoboken High School. Click here for information on how to register. 

The district kicked off the series in May, when it hosted six roundtable meetings specifically meant for district parents and guardians.

School Board President Sharyn Angley recently told TAPInto Hoboken officials have received “very positive” feedback during the sessions.

“Attendees have come with varying levels of knowledge with regard to district enrollment, facilities, programs, budget, etc. which has sparked some great questions and conversation. The small group format gives everyone the opportunity to participate in the discussion which is beneficial to all in attendance,” she also said.

Between March and April, the school board conducted a survey to gather input on the referendum and proposed project.

From an initial review of the questionnaire — which had almost 1,200 respondents from all six wards in Hoboken — the board said it picked up on a few themes, including the cost, necessity of the project and public amenities included in the plan. Many also said there are specific aspects of the district’s long-range facilities plan, including the new high school, on which they would like more information.

The proposed new high school — which was rejected by a margin of two to one in the Jan. 25 election — would have resulted in an estimated $500 per year increase in property taxes for the next 30 years.

Those who supported the measure pointed to the proposed amenities — such as a football stadium, theater, ice rink and swimming pool — as ones available in many suburban districts, while also touting the twenty-seven general classrooms, eight science labs, and six special education classrooms that were to be included.

Opponents argued that the money would be better spent on increasing teacher salaries, buying new technology and concentrating on improving student test scores. Some also expressed concern over the rollout of the proposal, claiming it lacked transparency.

Following the failed referendum, the board cannot post a new school plan for at least one calendar year.