PATH Taxi Stand- Hoboken, NJ November, 2017 |
Background: Traditional New Jersey school districts must all undergo the Quality Single Accountability Continuum (QSAC). NJDOE staff review documents and analyze district performance against critical indicators in 5 QSAC areas. One of those areas, and I argue the most important, is INSTRUCTION AND PROGRAM. A score of 80% is seen as satisfying specific weighted indicators.
Previous Success: While I was Assistant Superintendent, we were able to raise the QSAC score in INSTRUCTION AND PROGRAM from an initial score of 34% (a few months after we took over) to a high of 87%* in 2010 after the HBOE approved the revised curriculum and the results of the 2009 state test scores were analyzed.
* 2010 QSAC scores were based largely on academic year 2008-09 while I was Assistant Superintendent
Seven Years of Failing Scores: Unfortunately, after the 87% score in April of 2010, the Hoboken School District has scored below 80% each year in the QSAC INSTRUCTION AND PROGRAM DPR for 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.
Failure to Report 2016-17 QSAC Results: If you read the June 20, 2017 placement letter (below) you will find the following instructions to the District:
“Please be advised that QSAC regulations require your board of education to report these placement results at the next regularly scheduled board meeting.” -June 20, 2017 NJDOE letter to the BoardA review of meeting agendas and televised meetings indicate the following:
June 27, 2017- QSAC Results Not Presented to the Public as required
July 25, 2017- QSAC Results Not Presented to the Public as required
August 22, 2017- QSAC Results Not Presented to the Public as required
September 12, 2017- QSAC Results Not Presented to the Public as required
October 10, 2017- QSAC Results Not Presented to the Public as required