Look at the chart below and notice the incredible drop in capacity that occurred in the district buildings just as Elysian and Hoboken Charter were coming online and were requesting space. It is all here in black and white...
![]() |
Click to Enlarge |
This blog will provide a forum for those interested in Dr. Petrosino's perspective on education at the local, state and national levels. At all times, the basic premise is that the role of leadership is to create more leaders, not more followers.
![]() |
Click to Enlarge |
The current figures show that Wallace School is operating six students under capacity, Connors School is 15 under, Brandt School is 121 over capacity, Demarest Middle School is 8 over, and Hoboken High School is 220 students under capacity. These numbers include the 160 students currently enrolled through the CHOICE program, most of whom attend Hoboken High School.
If the CHOICE program were sunsetted—allowing currently enrolled students to graduate while admitting no new students—the district would gradually recover those 160 seats at the high school level over the next four years. This would bring the high school’s available capacity to approximately 380 open seats, significantly increasing flexibility in student placement and program design at the secondary level.
The only schools currently over capacity are Brandt and Demarest. Wallace and Connors both have available space, and the closure of Calabro School in 2020, which removed 137 seats from the system, likely contributed to current crowding in some elementary schools. However, with a phased end to the CHOICE program and more strategic use of existing space, the district has sufficient capacity across its schools to manage current and near-future enrollment levels.
Given this audited data and the likely future availability of space at the high school given some administrative decisions, there appears to be no urgency for new building construction based on enrollment and capacity.
Click to Enlarge |
Click to Enlarge |
Chart 1- NJDOE ELA 2023-24 |
Chart 2- NJDOE Math 2023-24 |
But let’s be clear: reflection without action is performative. It’s easy to pose for pictures and quote from history; it’s much harder to confront the uncomfortable present. The truth is, Black students in Hoboken are being failed academically (see Chart 1 and Chart 2), year after year, in a system that has every advantage—small class sizes, strong funding, stable staffing. These are not the conditions of scarcity. These are the conditions where excellence should be the norm—and yet, that excellence is not being delivered equitably.
If we are serious about honoring Juneteenth, we cannot look away from the data. When only a fraction of African American students are reading and doing math at grade level, it’s not a coincidence—it’s a systemic breakdown. And it is time to name names: school boards, superintendents, administrators, and yes, classroom educators all share in the responsibility for these outcomes. Equity is not a buzzword—it’s a deliverable. And right now, it’s being underdeliveredand underprioritized.
Hollow celebrations mean nothing if they’re not backed by bold leadership and measurable progress. We don’t need more hashtags and photo ops—we need accountability, urgency, and a plan. Hoboken owes its Black students more than symbolic recognition. It owes them a future.
The most recent released NJDOE disaggregated data (17 2210 HUDSON HOBOKEN) show that Hoboken's Black and Hispanic students are scoring drastically below their White peers in ELA and Math. These are not just academic gaps—they are systemic failures that directly threaten students' futures. In the 21st-century workforce, literacy and numeracy are essential for nearly every career. When students of color are left behind in these core areas year after year, Hoboken isn’t just failing state-mandated and required tests—it’s failing entire communities.
![]() |
CLICK TO ENLARGE |
![]() |
CLICK TO ENLARGE |
![]() |
CLICK TO ENLARGE |
The 2023-24 data released by the New Jersey Department of Education paint a troubling picture of educational equity in Hoboken. While headlines might praise the district’s above-average performance compared to state benchmarks, a more honest and critical look reveals a deeply segregated academic reality. White students in Hoboken are thriving at exceptional levels, while African American and Hispanic students are, in many cases, experiencing systemic academic neglect. These disparities reflect not just achievement gaps, but opportunity gaps—symptoms of deeper institutional failures in leadership, pedagogy, and accountability.
In Grade 3, 71% of Hoboken students met or exceeded expectations in ELA—significantly above the state average of 43.6%. But this number masks the truth: 80% of White students met the standard, compared to only 36.4% of African American students and 44.9% of Hispanic students. That means two-thirds of African American students and more than half of Hispanic students in Grade 3 are not reading or writing at grade level. This is not a new trend—it is a systemic failure that continues throughout the grade levels.
This pattern suggests that instructional practices, early literacy interventions, and culturally responsive curricula may be either inadequately implemented or entirely absent for non-white students. The district's leadership must confront the uncomfortable truth: some students are being served far better than others, and it is often along racial lines.
![]() |
Click to Enlarge |
Math scores deepen this concern. While the overall district performance looks strong on paper, the racial disparities are appalling. In Grade 3, 81.2% of White students met expectations, while only 18.2% of African American and 40.8% of Hispanic students did. By Grade 8, 0% of African American and only 3.6% of Hispanic students demonstrated grade-level proficiency. These are not just numbers—they are indictments.
Such disparities raise critical questions: What instructional supports are being provided to students of color? Are the best teachers equitably distributed across the district? Is the curriculum being differentiated effectively? And more importantly, where is the leadership in addressing these disparities year after year?
![]() |
Click to Enlarge |
Science scores echo this grim trend. Although statewide science proficiency is generally low, Hoboken’s White students outperform the state by a large margin in 11th grade (32.4%), while African American and Hispanic students drastically underperform (5.3% and 2.5%, respectively). The equity gap here is not merely a reflection of student effort or socioeconomic status—it is a reflection of systemic neglect.
![]() |
Click to Enlarge |
Summary
The Hoboken Public School District’s reputation for academic excellence is built on uneven ground. The data expose a district that, while high-achieving on the surface, perpetuates educational inequality behind closed doors. African American and Hispanic students are systematically underperforming in every subject and grade level analyzed. These aren't anomalies—they're patterns. And patterns point to institutional issues.
It is time for Hoboken’s educational leadership to be held accountable—not just for aggregate test scores, but for the moral and professional responsibility of ensuring equity. This includes investing in teacher training, reallocating resources, and committing to targeted interventions that address the needs of underserved students. Anything less is a continued failure.
Note: Charts shown above include solid black lines for state averages and dashed black lines for Hoboken's overall performance to aid in clarity and comparison.
I first met Richard E. Del Boccio when I was a sixth-grade student at School No. 8—the Sadie F. Leinkauf School—in Hoboken. He was the Vice Principal then, and even at that young age, I remember being struck by his presence: calm, respectful, and dignified. He treated students with fairness and humanity, and he left a lasting impression on me.
Years later, when I returned to the Hoboken Public Schools as a teacher, and eventually as Assistant Superintendent, I had the honor of working alongside him. Richard never changed—he remained the same steady, supportive, and principled educator I remembered from my childhood. His encouragement meant a great deal to me throughout my career.
In addition to his work at School No. 8, Richard taught history at Demarest and served with distinction for 17 years as principal of the Calabro School. He also served for a time as Interim Superintendent of Schools—always answering the call to lead when his city needed him.
His dedication extended beyond the classroom. Richard was a longtime member of St. Ann’s Parish, helping at the feast for many years, and an active member of the Hoboken Elks Lodge #74, where he chaired the Scholarship Committee for over a decade. His political service as Councilman-at-Large and Second Ward Councilman was marked by integrity and care.
Richard E. Del Boccio embodied the very best of old Hoboken. He was a gentleman in every sense—respected, admired, and never forgotten. -Dr. Anthony Petrosino
The following is a summary of various posts and concerns gleaned from multiple social media posts.
Statement on Hoboken BOE's Facilities Survey by Tony Petrosino on Scribd
What’s Really Going On With the Hoboken Board of Education?
The Hoboken Board of Education is supposed to be in charge of making sure public schools in the city are run fairly, responsibly, and with students’ best interests in mind. But unfortunately, the Board has made many choices in recent years that have caused people in the community to lose trust in them. Their latest move—an online survey asking what should be done about school buildings—is just one more example of how the Board acts without earning the community’s confidence.
This new survey is supposed to help the Board decide if Hoboken needs new school buildings or improvements to the ones we already have. That might sound like a good idea, but there’s a big problem: this Board has a history of making major decisions behind closed doors, without being honest or clear with the public. It’s hard to believe they will use this survey in a fair and honest way, especially since they wrote and are running it themselves without any outside experts. It even collects personal information, and they haven’t explained how it will be used or protected.
Let’s not forget that this is the same Board that tried to spend $300 million on a brand-new high school without asking for enough community input. They supported a superintendent who pretended to have a doctorate for nearly ten years. And now they’re trying to raise taxes by 24% in one year and another 15% the next—even though they promised long ago to keep tax increases small. For over ten years, the public hasn’t been allowed to vote on the school budget. That’s not right.
The Board has also made unfair decisions when it comes to charter schools. They spent two years and a lot of money trying to stop the HoLa Dual Language School from adding 7th and 8th grades. They also tried to block Elysian Charter School from enrolling just a few more kids. But at the same time, the Board brings in over 150 students from outside Hoboken every year through a special state program—then claims the schools are overcrowded. They can’t have it both ways.
Another serious issue is that the district has not done a good job helping all students succeed, especially Black and Hispanic students and those from families with lower incomes. These students continue to fall behind, even though the Board keeps saying things are improving. The truth doesn’t match the words.
Now the Board says it is creating a new 5-Year Plan to guide the future of the schools. That might sound promising, but one of the big goals in that plan is, once again, to focus on building projects—something the community has already rejected. The language they’re using sounds nice, but it hides a lot of the same old problems.
In the end, we need to be very careful. The Hoboken Board of Education has not shown that it can be trusted to act openly, honestly, or fairly. Until real change happens and they start listening to the people they serve, the community must stay alert, ask hard questions, and think twice before believing what the Board says—especially when it comes to surveys, plans, or big new projects.
Photo: May Day parade, Hoboken, NJ 1935
The Hoboken Board of Education is asking the community to weigh in on its long-range facilities plan — including if and how to build new schools. Even if you don’t have children in the district, this affects our entire city. The survey closes tomorrow - Monday, May 5th, so please take some time today to fill it out. Sorry for not circulating this sooner to you.
From time to time I post on social media and my posts often initiate comments from various people often with differing perspectives. My latest post about Algebra I scores seems to have inspired a fair amount of discussion. Here is my general reply to many of the posts I would also like to point out that there were many supportative comments from people as well. The important thing is to have a productive dialogue. -Dr. Petrosino
![]() |
Click to Enlarge |
It clearly shows 78% of Hoboken students tested by the state in Algebra 1 are not meeting NJDOE expectations
80% of economically disadvantaged students tested by the state in Algebra 1 are not meeting NJDOE expectations
75% of non-economically disadvantaged students tested by the state in Algebra 1 are not meeting NJDOE expectations.
![]() |
Click to Enlarge |
I am deeply disappointed and frankly alarmed by the recently released NJDOE data showing that 78% of our students are not meeting expectations in Algebra. This is more than just a statistic—it’s a reflection of a systemic issue that is failing our children and compromising their future.
Algebra is a gatekeeper to higher-level math, science, and ultimately college and career opportunities. When nearly four out of five students in our district are struggling to meet basic benchmarks, it’s not just an academic problem—it’s a social justice issue. These outcomes limit access, stifle potential, and perpetuate inequality.
I urge district leadership and school board members to treat this as the crisis it is. We need transparency, we need accountability, and most of all, we need a plan. Our students deserve high-quality instruction, meaningful support, and the chance to thrive—not be left behind.
This community cannot afford to accept these numbers as normal.
![]() |
Enhanced Chart 2023-2024 Algebra I Scores Hoboken Public Schools CLICK TO ENLARGE |
This website and its content is copyright of Dr. Anthony Petrosino - © Dr. Anthony Petrosino 2021. All rights reserved.
Any redistribution or reproduction of part or all of the contents in any form is prohibited other than the following:
· you may print or download to a local hard disk extracts for your personal and non-commercial use only
· you may copy the content to individual third parties for their personal use, but only if you acknowledge the website as the source of the material
You may not, except with my express written permission, distribute or commercially exploit the content. Nor may you transmit it or store it in any other website or other form of electronic retrieval system.
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Dr. Anthony Petrosino and while I attempt to keep the information up to date and correct, I make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
In no event will I be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.
Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of Dr. Anthony Petrosino. I have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, Dr. Anthony Petrosino takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond his control.