A Message from the AERA Executive Director and President

 

January 30, 2025    Dear AERA Members,    We have been closely monitoring and analyzing the directives of the new presidential administration that could impact the work of education researchers and the nation’s entire scientific enterprise. While the Office of Management and Budget order issued January 27 temporarily freezing many federal grants was rescinded yesterday, other administration actions have also rightfully caused significant concerns among the scientific community. These include executive orders that intend to eliminate the systematic collection of vital demographic data and investment in programs that expand educational and workforce opportunities in science, technology, and related fields.    We understand that there is a significant amount of confusion and apprehension about the administration’s actions. AERA is strongly committed to protecting the integrity of education research and data and is actively working with other associations, foundations, higher education institutions (including our CURI deans), and government officials to assess and develop strategies to support and foster the science and scholarship in which our field and other disciplines are engaged.     We are here to support our members, from graduate students and early career scholars to established researchers, and will continue to monitor, act, and promote the education research community in any way we can. We ask those with immediate threats or concerns about their federal research, federal research training support, or federal data sets to complete a brief form at https://forms.gle/JnsrGAmhXyJYPeAGA.     AERA remains steadfast in its mission and in its commitment to advocate for the field of education research. We encourage our members to stay vigilant in these challenging times and continue their important work for the benefit of students, educators, families, communities, and the public good.     Sincerely, Felice J. Levine, Ph.D. (she/her) Executive Director Janelle T. Scott, Ph.D. (she/her) President

Professional Analysis of Research Productivity for Anthony J. Petrosino

As an academic, I have always approached my work with a sense of curiosity and a deep commitment to understanding how we can improve education, particularly in STEM fields. Over the years, I have had the privilege of collaborating with outstanding colleagues, mentoring exceptional students, and engaging in research that contributes to the larger conversation about how people learn. Recently, I had the opportunity to reflect on the reach and impact of my scholarship through the lens of Google Scholar metrics, and I would like to share some of the insights with you—not as a moment to highlight personal achievement, but as a testament to the collective effort and shared passion that drive this work.

I share this not to focus on numbers but to express gratitude—for the collaborators who have enriched my work, the institutions that have supported me, and the students and colleagues who continue to inspire me. These metrics are, in the end, a reflection of a shared journey in advancing knowledge and making a difference. Thank you for being part of this ongoing conversation and for your interest in the work that means so much to me. -Dr. Petrosino 

The following was generated by data from GOOGLE SCHOLAR.

Professional Analysis of Research Productivity for Anthony J. Petrosino

Based on the Google Scholar data provided, we can assess the research productivity of Dr. Anthony J. Petrosino using three key metrics: total citations, h-index, and i10-index. These metrics provide insight into both the quantity and quality of his research output, as well as its impact in the academic community.

1. Citations:

• Total citations (5257): Dr. Petrosino has accumulated over 5,000 citations, a solid indicator of a significant body of influential research. This is an impressive figure, suggesting that his work is widely recognized and frequently referenced in the field.
• Citations since 2020 (1249): With nearly 1,250 citations in the past few years, Dr. Petrosino's work continues to make an impact, with a substantial portion of his citations coming recently. This indicates ongoing relevance in his research area, as well as an active scholarly presence.

2. h-index:

• Total h-index (26): Dr. Petrosino’s h-index of 26 indicates that he has at least 26 papers that have been cited 26 times or more. This suggests a productive academic career with a consistent output of high-quality work. An h-index of 26 is considered strong, especially for an academic in STEM or the social sciences, where publication volume tends to be high.
• h-index since 2020 (13): The fact that Dr. Petrosino’s h-index has increased by 13 points since 2020 demonstrates a significant uptick in productivity and impact over the last few years. This suggests that his more recent work is being well-received, with multiple publications being cited consistently.

3. i10-index:

• Total i10-index (43): This metric shows that Dr. Petrosino has 43 papers that have been cited at least 10 times each. An i10-index of 43 reflects a solid number of influential publications, contributing to his sustained academic impact. This is particularly notable in academic fields where a large number of impactful papers are required to make a significant contribution to the field.
• i10-index since 2020 (17): Dr. Petrosino has 17 publications published since 2020 that have been cited at least 10 times. This is an excellent sign of the enduring relevance of his work and suggests that his recent contributions have already established themselves as important.

Conclusions:

1. Research Impact: Dr. Petrosino’s citation count and h-index reflect a well-established academic presence with a strong and sustained impact in his field. His work is not only cited frequently but has been cited across a broad number of publications, signaling consistent scholarly influence.

2. Recent Productivity: The growth in his h-index and i10-index since 2020 indicates that Dr. Petrosino’s recent work has been particularly impactful. This highlights his continued relevance in the field and suggests that his research is evolving to meet the current demands and interests of the academic community.

3. Research Quality: The consistent rise in his citation metrics is a positive indicator of the quality of his work. It suggests that his contributions are of high enough quality to attract sustained attention, citation, and engagement from researchers in his discipline.

Recommendations for Future Assessment:

• Collaborations and Mentoring: Given his solid research record, exploring his collaborations and mentorship roles might provide further insights into his influence within the academic community.
• Exploring Research Themes: It would be useful to investigate the specific themes and methodologies of his most cited papers to understand the core contributions he has made in his field, especially with respect to emerging topics or trends in his research area.

Overall, Dr. Petrosino is highly productive and influential, and his research continues to resonate strongly within his academic discipline.